Saturday, April 14 I gave a talk at SSOM’s annual meeting, the Swedish Society for Orthomolecular Medicine, where I went through the sequence of events surrounding the corona pandemic. What I mainly addressed was the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and how the mRNA vaccine affected it. But I also shed light on the debate surrounding antiviral drugs. It concerned an outlook on countries throughout the world and was based on official sources and scientific articles.
There were about 70 people who listened to me and two more famous people (doctors), who had a slightly different angle on their lectures. Afterwards there was a question and answer session.
All the major daily newspapers, including VLT, as well as TT, SVT and SR, were invited via repeated emails – no one came. SSOM had also advertised in Dagens Medicin – both in the newspaper and on the web.
What I highlighted, among other things, was that in the Nordic countries there were more people who died of covid-19 after the vaccine was introduced than before. That the countries in Africa that had been part of the WHO’s APOC project, i.e. where the population was treated with ivermectin to reduce the risk of river blindness and elephantiasis, had approximately 4 times fewer infected and nearly 6 times fewer deaths from covid-19 than other countries in Africa.
Ivermectin is a lot safe medicine that has been used since 1987 and where a treatment costs a few hundred kroner, but which was banned in the USA and several other countries for use against covid-19. This as a strong overdose could cause side effects. Incidentally, around 80 percent of those who died in Sweden took an average of five different medicines every day, which can also cause strong side effects.
What I also highlighted was that there is only a weak correlation showing that vaccination would prevent people dying from covid-19. And in 2023, there was a positive correlation between excess mortality and vaccination rate – the higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality. What this is due to, no one knows for sure, but the presence of so-called IgG4 antibodies, which most people get after the third injection, may be one of the reasons.
It has now also been shown that the vaccinated strongly contributed to the spread of infection.
vaccination pass, which was required for a period in Sweden and in many other countries, was a completely unnecessary act that created false security.
I also brought up studies that show that a predominantly vegetarian diet and supplements of certain minerals and vitamins, such as zinc, vitamin D and vitamin C, as well as outdoor exercise and good sleep, can protect against severe illness and death in covid-19. This as it strengthens the immune system. But also that a strong immune system can protect against future pandemics.
History has shown that. In Denmark, the mortality rate from the Spanish flu in 1918 decreased by 2 percent, while in Sweden it increased by 32 percent. This is probably due to a completely changed diet that nutritionist Dr. Hindhede introduced in 1917 on behalf of the Danish government.
Why hasn’t the mass media spread all new information? Why are the politicians turning a blind eye? Why isn’t a new “corona commission” added that reviews the new scientific data available? Do the authorities and politicians hope that we will all forget the wrong decisions that were made?
Official society seems stuck in a narrative that the only salvation from severe illness and death in covid-19 was the unproven mRNA vaccine. No one seems to want to listen to new information that risks upsetting their world view. An image that the medical industry, with the help of its allied scientists and authorities, said was our only salvation.
Is there no civil courage in today’s medical reporters? Where did the digging journalist go whose goal was to describe reality, regardless of whether it compromised the establishment.
Pehr-Johan Fager
Independent health debater
